ProPep Surgical

Nerve Monitoring Technology for Robotic Prostate Surgery

  • Find A Surgeon
  • For Patients
  • For Surgeons
  • Clinical Info
    • Use of the ProPep Nerve Monitoring System
    • Informational Videos
    • White Papers
    • Patient Reported Outcome Trials
    • Patents & Registrations
  • Testimonials
Patients and the ProPep Advantage Learn More
About Us Contact Us (512) 617–6740

How it Works

Sexual dysfunction and urinary incontinence are both common side effects following prostate cancer surgery and inadvertent nerve injury occurring during the surgery is believed to be one of the primary causes.[1, 2]  To avoid nerve damage during surgery, surgeons typically employ a nerve-sparing procedure and although these nerves-sparing procedures have significantly reduced the incidence of sexual dysfunction and incontinence following prostatectomy surgery, literature still reports 

38% - 40% of patients experience sexual dysfunction [8]

20% - 44% of patients are incontinent 12 months after “successful” nerve-sparing, robotic-assisted prostatectomy surgery [3]

There are two types of nerves responsible for controlling sexual function and urinary continence – autonomic nerves and somatic nerves.[4] Both types of nerves are too small to be seen, as a result, surgeons must rely on anatomic landmarks to determine what tissue to avoid to keep from damaging them during the surgery. The nerve-sparing procedures the surgeons currently perform rely on these landmarks.  Unfortunately, published literature has shown the location of the somatic nerves involved in sexual function and continence control vary considerably and these anatomic landmarks are not always reliable in identifying where they are. [5, 6, 7]

The solution to identifying these critical somatic nerves - the ProPep® Nerve Monitoring System.

The ProPep® Nerve Monitoring System consists of:

  • Pep Monitor® - generates the specific electrical signal used to stimulate the tissue of interest, and records, analyzes and displays the response to that signal.
  • Pep Control Switch® - enables the surgeon to switch the robotic surgical instrument from cautery mode to stimulation mode and back. (The electrical stimulation signal generated by the Pep Monitor is delivered through the surgeon’s robotic surgical instrument thus eliminating the need to introduce a separate stimulation probe into the surgical field.)
  • Pep Electrode® Kit - a single use disposable, containing the Pep Electrode® and the Pep Electrode® Introducer. The Pep Electrode® is connected to the Pep Monitor® and introduced into the surgical field via the Pep Electrode® Introducer. Once in the surgical field, the Pep Electrode® is placed in the tissue of interest to receive the electrical signals generated as a result of tissue stimulation.

1. Hollabaugh RS, Dmochowskia RR, Kneiba TG, Steinera MS.  (June 1998).  Urology Preservation of Putative Continence Nerves during Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Leads to More Rapid Return of Urinary Continence. Urology; Volume 51, Issue 6, pages 960-967.

2. Shafik A. Pudendal canal decompression in the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Arch Androl. 1994 Mar-Apr; 32(2): 141-9.

3. Rafael F. Coelho, M.D., Bernardo Rocco, M.D., Manoj B. Patel, M.D., et al. Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Critical Review of Outcomes Reported by High-Volume Centers. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY Vol. 24, No.12, December 2003-2015.

4. Lavoisier P, Proulx J, Courtois F, De Carufel F, Durand L-G. Relationship between muscle contractions, penile tumescence, and penile rigidity during nocturnal erections. J Urol. 1988 Jan; 139: 176 -9.

5. Zvara P, Carrier S, Kour N-W, Tanagho EA. The detailed neuroanatomy of the human striated urethral sphincter. BJU. 1994; 74: 182 – 187.

6. Akita K, Sakamoto H, Sato T. Origins and courses of the nervous branches to the male urethral sphincter. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003; 25: 387 – 392

7. Schraffordt SE, Tjandra JJ, Eizenberg N, Dwyer PL. Anatomy of the pudendal nerve and its terminal branches: a cadaver study. ANZ J. Surg. 2004: 74: 23 – 26

8. Sabine Geiger-Gritsch, Wilhelm Oberaigner, Nikolai, et al. Patient-Reported Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction Following Radical Prostatectomy: Results from the European Prostate Centre Innsbruck. Urologia Internationalis. 2015; 419-427. DOI: 10.1159/000369475

For Patients: What You Need to Know

  • About ProPep Nerve Monitoring System
  • Why Your Surgeon Should Use It
  • How it Works
  • How It's Paid For
  • What the Surgeons are Saying
  • Learn More...

ASSISTING SURGEONS. PROTECTING PATIENTS.

The ProPep® Nerve Monitoring System is the first FDA-cleared real-time nerve monitoring system for laparoscopic & robotic prostatectomy surgery. This system helps surgeons identify critical non-visible somatic nerves at risk during surgery, thereby allowing the surgeon to make more-informed decisions on how to spare these nerves, potentially minimizing nerve damage.

As a patient you should know that this type of nerve identification technology is standard of care for thyroid and parotid surgery, both cancerous glands that need to be removed with vital nerves at risk in doing so.

A PATIENT'S PERSPECTIVE
Hear Tim talk about his experience - from diagnosis to decision-making.

Patients

  • Find a Surgeon
  • ProPep Prostatectomy Surgeons
  • How It’s Paid For
  • Information and Support

Surgeons

  • Results of ProPep Clinical Study
  • ProPep Nerve Monitoring System Use
  • Informational Videos
  • White Papers
  • Surgeon FAQs
  • Surgeons Survey Results
  • Patient Pay Form
  • 2022 Reimbursement Coding

Company Info

  • Company Info
  • ProPep Leadership
  • ProPep Distributors
  • Media Coverage
  • Contact

Legal

  • Patents & Registrations
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Medical Advice Disclaimer
  • Product Training Disclaimer

© 2025 · ProPep Surgical - All Rights Reserved